i Dalam bukunya Ampy kali (Diskursus Seksualitas Michel Foucault, , 15) dituiskan “ saat enempuh pendidikan di ENS, kecerdasan Foucault cukup. Michel Foucault is a major source for the idea in critical accounting and . Pemikiran Foucault setelah arkeologi pengetahuan adalah genealogi yang ditan – dai. Arkeologi pengetahuan /. Main Author: Foucault, Michel, Other Authors: Zoerni,. Published: Yogyakarta: Penerbit Qalam, Subjects.
|Published (Last):||18 September 2015|
|PDF File Size:||10.62 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.42 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Do not ask who I am and do not ask me to remain the same: This page has been accessedtimes.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. From Foucault, Death and the Labyrinth: Interesting, but too in-depth unless you really want to get at the philosophical underpinnings of his Archaeological method. This discursive approach is a calibration to its own in consistencies, seemingly for its own sake.
Now it feels like staring at shadows. Quotes from Arkeologi Pengeta Pretty boring but fascinating. One might say that all philosophy is an exploration, and that would be right, except that most often you explore to find solid footing. Views Read Edit History.
Arkeologi Pengetahuan by Michel Foucault (3 star ratings)
peengetahuan Mudah dimengerti, Foucault adalah salah satu pemikir terkemuka ffoucault atau post-modernisme yang amat lekat dengan semangat “dekonstruksi, relativitas, dan pluralitas”.
Though often cited as a post-structuralist and postmodernist, Foucault ultimately rejected these labels, preferring to classify his thought as a critical history of modernity. For Foucault there might be some solid footing for his own understanding, but what good is that to any of us? Apa gerangan yang dimaksud gila oleh Foucault?
Bila selama ini kita mengenal istilah arkeologi sebagai disiplin ilmu yang bertalian dengan kerja-kerja observatif-lapangan, misal penggalian temuan candi, Foucault, lah, yang mentransfernya ke pengetanuan filsafat. In the s Foucault was associated with structuralism, a movement from which he distanced himself.
He spends a laborious amount of time constructing the exact definition of discourse that he is going to be discussing, as well as taking into consideration almost every counter-argument that could be used against him, that I felt I was reading an elaborate note tree instead of a piece of theory.
Penyetahuan of his arguments is that scholars remain committed to the antiquated notion that authors repeat themselves across their texts.
For whatever reason, Foucault feels the need to defend himself against critics, and perhaps defend himself against his own critiques. For now, I enjoyed reading the conclusion and bits throughout the construction of his argument – so, a positive rating. Foucault’s realization of his methodological tenets is groping, timid, and frustrating for its revision of use of terms like “discourse,” but its awkward fucault nevertheless sheds light on the thinker’s compelling philosophy and method, pairing well with the later History of Sexuality.
This book was a major influence. Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Pengetshuan by Michel Foucault. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Dan, bagaimana postulasi kegilaan berkorelasi dengan temuan arkeologis suatu peradaban?
Preview: Arkeologi pengetahuan /
foucaault Are you already preparing the way out that will enable you in your next book to spring up somewhere else and declare as you’re now doing: Of course, Foucault himself would hate this: The exploration is interesting and thought-provoking, but, indeed, essentially it all boils down to an exploration.
My three stars has nothing to do with Foucault’s brilliant deconstruction of language, but rather the achievement of maximum verbosity. And that is kind of annoying. Summer, Entry into the Ecole normale superieure, Paris. Are you going to declare yet again that you have never been what you have been reproached with being? Pablo rated it liked it Oct 19, Return to Book Page. The content is available under fair use. This page was last modified on 16 Decemberat Where or how or why this happens is beyond Foucault.
The Discourse was much better than Archaeology, which was a real slog. Arkeologi Pengetahuan by Michel Foucault. Lists with This Book. Want to Read saving…. Arkeologl policy About Monoskop Disclaimers. Trivia About The Archaeology o David Dalakishvili rated it liked it Jan 29, I suppose that in its time, this was cutting edge. Selamat mengembara bersama pemuka post-modernisme ini. Published October 15th by Pelangi first published Ultimately, the point is that in excavating history we should seek “relations” that enable discursive practices — rather than search for transcendental “truths” beneath repetitions.
Be the first to ask a question about Arkeologi Pengetahuan. Di antara sumbangan berharga Michel Foucault pada konstelasi keilmuan dan filsafat kontemporer ialah buku The Archaeology of Knowledge ini.
It’s not difficult to read, exactly, but when he finally gets to his argument about the ways language is structured through complicated discursive practices of arrangement and power I was grateful in a, “I’ve gotten to the fireworks factory,” sort of way.
Ada begitu pengehahuan soal dan kritik wacana yang patut disimak darinya.